(no subject)
Aug. 10th, 2004 01:18 amAhem, ignore the last thing I said about shipping Jeeves and Psmith. A thought has occured to me. (Oh, I am relieved, miss.)
If not actually slashing Psmith and Jeeves, would it not have been an ideal circumstance if the latter was actually employed by the former?
In 'Bertie Changes His Mind', Jeeves said that: "Mr Wooster is a young gentleman, with practically every desirable quality except one. I do not mean brains for in an employer brains are not desirable. The quality to which I allude is hard to define, but perhaps I might call it the gift of dealing with the Unusual Situation. In the presence of the Unusual, Mr Wooster is too prone to smile weakly and allow his eyes to protrude. He lacks Presence. I have often wished that I had the power to bestow upon him some of the savoir-faire of a former employer of mine ....."
While reading Leave It To Psmith, I kept thinking back on this. All things that in a mind like Reginald Jeeves's would be undesirable in a fellow like Bertie, were righted in Psmith's character; and all the things that were desirable still remained.
Psmith wouldn't dream of buying purple socks, Etonian spats or alpine hats; or start playing the banjolele on a lark. He's a perfect gentleman of (usually) impeccable manners and can cope with any situation you fling at him.
But would Psmith be too intelligent for Jeeves? I don't particularly see him as the scholarly, learned type, but he's smart enough. If brains are not desirable in an employer, would Bertie's bumbling weigh up against Psmith's sharp mind?
Put it like this, and I'll ask you a question. Suppose for a second, that one day Mr Psmith showed up at Number 6, Crichton Mansions, Berkely Street, W. Suppose he offered Bertie a too generous to be passed up sum of money for Jeeves. Suppose Bertie left Jeeves to decide (which he probably would anyway). Which do you think would look a more appealing employer from the valet's point of view?
If not actually slashing Psmith and Jeeves, would it not have been an ideal circumstance if the latter was actually employed by the former?
In 'Bertie Changes His Mind', Jeeves said that: "Mr Wooster is a young gentleman, with practically every desirable quality except one. I do not mean brains for in an employer brains are not desirable. The quality to which I allude is hard to define, but perhaps I might call it the gift of dealing with the Unusual Situation. In the presence of the Unusual, Mr Wooster is too prone to smile weakly and allow his eyes to protrude. He lacks Presence. I have often wished that I had the power to bestow upon him some of the savoir-faire of a former employer of mine ....."
While reading Leave It To Psmith, I kept thinking back on this. All things that in a mind like Reginald Jeeves's would be undesirable in a fellow like Bertie, were righted in Psmith's character; and all the things that were desirable still remained.
Psmith wouldn't dream of buying purple socks, Etonian spats or alpine hats; or start playing the banjolele on a lark. He's a perfect gentleman of (usually) impeccable manners and can cope with any situation you fling at him.
But would Psmith be too intelligent for Jeeves? I don't particularly see him as the scholarly, learned type, but he's smart enough. If brains are not desirable in an employer, would Bertie's bumbling weigh up against Psmith's sharp mind?
Put it like this, and I'll ask you a question. Suppose for a second, that one day Mr Psmith showed up at Number 6, Crichton Mansions, Berkely Street, W. Suppose he offered Bertie a too generous to be passed up sum of money for Jeeves. Suppose Bertie left Jeeves to decide (which he probably would anyway). Which do you think would look a more appealing employer from the valet's point of view?
no subject
Date: 2004-08-10 09:57 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-08-10 10:28 am (UTC)I still think Psmith would be a most suitable employer for a man like Jeeves.
Of course, Jeeves might (rightly) think Bertie couldn't do without him and would most likely end up affianced to some horribly unsuitable girl within the next two weeks.
*G* Or it'd be like having to give up the puppy you got for Christmas. It'll do things wrong every now and then, but only from the noblest
or most bird-brainedintentions, and you wouldn't want to trade him in even if he did wear green ties. ... er.. wait...no subject
Date: 2004-08-10 09:23 pm (UTC)The world needs more Jeevesslash.
no subject
Date: 2004-08-10 10:39 pm (UTC)I've got precisely thirty J&W fics bookmarked at the moment, but all of them (save one, which is Bertie/Rocky) are Bertie/Jeeves.
Pity, I'd been hoping to find some Bertie/Bingo as well. Damn this fandom for not having more writers. And damn me for not being able to churn out more than two sentences or else I'd do it myself.
no subject
Date: 2004-08-10 11:11 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-08-10 11:19 pm (UTC)But damn those bunnies.
All right, I'll gove it a shot, but don't expect any grand results too soon. I need to get the old cerebellum fired up properly first.
Did you write a J&W one?
no subject
Date: 2004-08-11 06:26 am (UTC)Yes I have written mainly J/W. List the fics you detest and I'll tell you which ones I wrote!! Heehee.
no subject
Date: 2004-08-11 08:48 am (UTC)I'm looking now which you wrote. I was thron off track by your lj-name. I have the NY drabblets and 'Newt' by you.
Bwee! I just re-read Newt yesterday. ^_^ And 'Cute' is the most adorable thing ever.
How dare you allow the women of this city to make free with your person with impunity?”
“When in Rome, Sir.
HEE! I'm sorry, I'm all giggly now.
no subject
Date: 2004-08-12 08:30 am (UTC)It's probably too late for this, but don't bother reading Lift, it's crap. Am working on a third one that should hopefully be ok.
no subject
Date: 2004-08-12 09:02 am (UTC)Whee! More fic. There seriously needs to be more.
no subject
Date: 2004-08-12 10:45 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-08-13 02:05 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-08-13 05:10 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-08-13 08:03 am (UTC)I'm sorry, that just almost made me splorfle my chocolate milk.
no subject
Date: 2004-08-13 08:57 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-08-14 09:18 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-08-11 07:30 am (UTC)“It’s awfully odd, Jeeves,” I said,
Clearly I started a Jeeves and Wooster drabble, but damned if I know what Bertie thought was so odd. :/
no subject
Date: 2004-08-11 08:54 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-08-12 08:32 am (UTC)