(no subject)
Aug. 10th, 2004 01:18 amAhem, ignore the last thing I said about shipping Jeeves and Psmith. A thought has occured to me. (Oh, I am relieved, miss.)
If not actually slashing Psmith and Jeeves, would it not have been an ideal circumstance if the latter was actually employed by the former?
In 'Bertie Changes His Mind', Jeeves said that: "Mr Wooster is a young gentleman, with practically every desirable quality except one. I do not mean brains for in an employer brains are not desirable. The quality to which I allude is hard to define, but perhaps I might call it the gift of dealing with the Unusual Situation. In the presence of the Unusual, Mr Wooster is too prone to smile weakly and allow his eyes to protrude. He lacks Presence. I have often wished that I had the power to bestow upon him some of the savoir-faire of a former employer of mine ....."
While reading Leave It To Psmith, I kept thinking back on this. All things that in a mind like Reginald Jeeves's would be undesirable in a fellow like Bertie, were righted in Psmith's character; and all the things that were desirable still remained.
Psmith wouldn't dream of buying purple socks, Etonian spats or alpine hats; or start playing the banjolele on a lark. He's a perfect gentleman of (usually) impeccable manners and can cope with any situation you fling at him.
But would Psmith be too intelligent for Jeeves? I don't particularly see him as the scholarly, learned type, but he's smart enough. If brains are not desirable in an employer, would Bertie's bumbling weigh up against Psmith's sharp mind?
Put it like this, and I'll ask you a question. Suppose for a second, that one day Mr Psmith showed up at Number 6, Crichton Mansions, Berkely Street, W. Suppose he offered Bertie a too generous to be passed up sum of money for Jeeves. Suppose Bertie left Jeeves to decide (which he probably would anyway). Which do you think would look a more appealing employer from the valet's point of view?
If not actually slashing Psmith and Jeeves, would it not have been an ideal circumstance if the latter was actually employed by the former?
In 'Bertie Changes His Mind', Jeeves said that: "Mr Wooster is a young gentleman, with practically every desirable quality except one. I do not mean brains for in an employer brains are not desirable. The quality to which I allude is hard to define, but perhaps I might call it the gift of dealing with the Unusual Situation. In the presence of the Unusual, Mr Wooster is too prone to smile weakly and allow his eyes to protrude. He lacks Presence. I have often wished that I had the power to bestow upon him some of the savoir-faire of a former employer of mine ....."
While reading Leave It To Psmith, I kept thinking back on this. All things that in a mind like Reginald Jeeves's would be undesirable in a fellow like Bertie, were righted in Psmith's character; and all the things that were desirable still remained.
Psmith wouldn't dream of buying purple socks, Etonian spats or alpine hats; or start playing the banjolele on a lark. He's a perfect gentleman of (usually) impeccable manners and can cope with any situation you fling at him.
But would Psmith be too intelligent for Jeeves? I don't particularly see him as the scholarly, learned type, but he's smart enough. If brains are not desirable in an employer, would Bertie's bumbling weigh up against Psmith's sharp mind?
Put it like this, and I'll ask you a question. Suppose for a second, that one day Mr Psmith showed up at Number 6, Crichton Mansions, Berkely Street, W. Suppose he offered Bertie a too generous to be passed up sum of money for Jeeves. Suppose Bertie left Jeeves to decide (which he probably would anyway). Which do you think would look a more appealing employer from the valet's point of view?
no subject
Date: 2004-08-10 01:21 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-08-10 09:57 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-08-10 10:28 am (UTC)I still think Psmith would be a most suitable employer for a man like Jeeves.
Of course, Jeeves might (rightly) think Bertie couldn't do without him and would most likely end up affianced to some horribly unsuitable girl within the next two weeks.
*G* Or it'd be like having to give up the puppy you got for Christmas. It'll do things wrong every now and then, but only from the noblest
or most bird-brainedintentions, and you wouldn't want to trade him in even if he did wear green ties. ... er.. wait...no subject
Date: 2004-08-10 09:23 pm (UTC)The world needs more Jeevesslash.
no subject
Date: 2004-08-10 10:39 pm (UTC)I've got precisely thirty J&W fics bookmarked at the moment, but all of them (save one, which is Bertie/Rocky) are Bertie/Jeeves.
Pity, I'd been hoping to find some Bertie/Bingo as well. Damn this fandom for not having more writers. And damn me for not being able to churn out more than two sentences or else I'd do it myself.
no subject
Date: 2004-08-10 11:11 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-08-10 11:19 pm (UTC)But damn those bunnies.
All right, I'll gove it a shot, but don't expect any grand results too soon. I need to get the old cerebellum fired up properly first.
Did you write a J&W one?
no subject
Date: 2004-08-11 06:26 am (UTC)Yes I have written mainly J/W. List the fics you detest and I'll tell you which ones I wrote!! Heehee.
no subject
Date: 2004-08-11 08:48 am (UTC)I'm looking now which you wrote. I was thron off track by your lj-name. I have the NY drabblets and 'Newt' by you.
Bwee! I just re-read Newt yesterday. ^_^ And 'Cute' is the most adorable thing ever.
How dare you allow the women of this city to make free with your person with impunity?”
“When in Rome, Sir.
HEE! I'm sorry, I'm all giggly now.
no subject
Date: 2004-08-12 08:30 am (UTC)It's probably too late for this, but don't bother reading Lift, it's crap. Am working on a third one that should hopefully be ok.
no subject
Date: 2004-08-12 09:02 am (UTC)Whee! More fic. There seriously needs to be more.
no subject
Date: 2004-08-12 10:45 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-08-13 02:05 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-08-13 05:10 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-08-13 08:03 am (UTC)I'm sorry, that just almost made me splorfle my chocolate milk.
no subject
Date: 2004-08-13 08:57 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-08-14 09:18 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-08-11 07:30 am (UTC)“It’s awfully odd, Jeeves,” I said,
Clearly I started a Jeeves and Wooster drabble, but damned if I know what Bertie thought was so odd. :/
no subject
Date: 2004-08-11 08:54 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-08-12 08:32 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-08-10 04:02 am (UTC)is liek omg so totally in luuuurve!has a lot of affection for him which I don't think Mr. Psmith would be able to compensate for. Also, Bertie shows proper appreciation of Jeeves' awesome prowess (*ahem*).no subject
Date: 2004-08-10 10:41 am (UTC)... Of course, Psmith is rather more perfidious than Bertie, who wouldn't even know what perfidious meant. With B. you know what you're getting, Psmith is rather more unpredictable. Not as sincere, I mean to say.
Good point on the appreciation bit! I'm not prepared to go as far as to say Psmith wouldn't appreciate anything Jeeves would do for him, but he certainly wouldn't be as earnestly thankful as Bertie (and wouldn't have reason to be).
Hm, yes. Jeeves/Bertie still stands strong.
no subject
Date: 2004-08-10 08:22 pm (UTC)If Jeeves and Psmith were acquainted BEFORE he engaged himself to Bertie, however...hmmm. They'd not be a pair to trifle with, that's for sure.
no subject
Date: 2004-08-10 08:35 pm (UTC)The question is, of course, whether Jeeves continues domineering the household for Bertie's own good, or simply because it is in his nature.
no subject
Date: 2004-08-10 10:32 pm (UTC)Hm...Psmith is also seems to be prone to odd fancies, which might not sit well with Jeeves (q.v. the banjolele incident). But having once had a neighbor who played the banjo with somewhat less than perfect skill, I can safely say that such endeavors would drive away even the most imperturbable of people, so there you go.
I still doubt that Jeeves could be convinced to leave Bertie (he can't even tie his tie on his own...it would be like tossing a kitten out onto the street and expecting it to fend for itself), but I really fancy the idea of Psmith being a former employer of Jeeves...
no subject
Date: 2004-08-10 10:34 pm (UTC)It seems kind of unthinkable that Jeeves could be fired from a job.
no subject
Date: 2004-08-11 07:24 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-08-11 08:52 am (UTC)*ponders on this*