A question for the assembled
Nov. 15th, 2009 12:21 amA few days ago I posted a vid of London in 1927. I think a lot of us were fascinated by how different things were then. Far fewer private vehicles, and every one of them moving much slower than cars would today in the same circumstances. People moved more slowly. More people walking in the streets. Attitudes were considerably different then as well, as were social mores.
And this led me to thinking about Bertie and Jeeves in 1927 and what would happen to them if they got picked up by some cosmic wind and accidentally dropped somewhere in the world today with nothing but the clothes on their backs and what was in their pockets. What would they do? What would they think? Who would adjust more easily?
There would be an immense number of problems for them to overcome. No one would believe them if they tried to tell anyone what had happened, of course, unless the person had happened to witness their arrival. Their money would be essentially useless except as antiques or for the metal in them. They would have no valid identity papers. Almost everything would be strange and confusing. Even if they were still in London, a great deal changed during the second world war. Everyone they knew would be long gone or over 100 years old.
I'd love to hear your theories, esteemed birds and beazels.
And this led me to thinking about Bertie and Jeeves in 1927 and what would happen to them if they got picked up by some cosmic wind and accidentally dropped somewhere in the world today with nothing but the clothes on their backs and what was in their pockets. What would they do? What would they think? Who would adjust more easily?
There would be an immense number of problems for them to overcome. No one would believe them if they tried to tell anyone what had happened, of course, unless the person had happened to witness their arrival. Their money would be essentially useless except as antiques or for the metal in them. They would have no valid identity papers. Almost everything would be strange and confusing. Even if they were still in London, a great deal changed during the second world war. Everyone they knew would be long gone or over 100 years old.
I'd love to hear your theories, esteemed birds and beazels.
no subject
Date: 2009-11-15 08:31 am (UTC)I think Bertie would be the one to keep them afloat, at least at first. He's easygoing and charming and seems to cope pretty well with life's weirdnesses. Jeeves is a total control freak and he would have lost most of the resources he uses to keep things in their lives under control. His formality would put people off where Bertie's openness might find them some aid and sympathy. The way people dress and act would probably shake him to the core where Bertie would take it all in stride, though he'd express some confusion at first.
Once Jeeves had found his sea legs, so to speak, I think he'd find a way to at least keep them together with a roof over their heads, though it would take some doing. The expense of things relative to what they cost back then would be a big obstacle.
If they were stuck somewhere outside the UK, they'd be in even more trouble, though. Without proper ID, they'd be considered illegal aliens if they were found. That, of course, might land them in a soup hotter than Bertie could probably imagine. Even Jeeves's supersized strainer might not be able to get them out of it.
They'd need to find an ally, wherever it was they fetched up. It would make figuring the world out a lot easier for both of them.
no subject
Date: 2009-11-15 09:30 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-11-15 09:50 am (UTC)Of course, if they ended up getting together under the much more lenient laws and social attitudes today, that would would be entirely spiffing.
no subject
Date: 2009-11-15 04:30 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-11-15 07:13 pm (UTC)It was a time machine, not a whirlwind, that got them here. V. original, what? I stopped working on it months ago.
no subject
Date: 2009-11-15 07:19 pm (UTC)Oh, but why? :-(((((
no subject
Date: 2009-11-15 09:51 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-11-15 10:42 am (UTC)Is anybody else game, or is this a goofy sort of idea?
no subject
Date: 2009-11-15 05:40 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-11-15 09:52 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-11-16 12:57 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-11-15 04:01 pm (UTC)But alas! I have been stuck on it for awhile now, mostly because it's been hard to get everything right, historically.
no subject
Date: 2009-11-15 04:36 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-11-15 09:55 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-11-15 05:17 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-11-15 05:44 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-11-15 09:57 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-11-15 07:51 pm (UTC)I confess that when I'm out shopping, I often try to imagine how our duo would react to the various wares on display--from clothing to groceries!
I agree that Bertie would probably take to modern gadgets like a duck to the old wet stuff. If he got his hands on a nice electronic keyboard, he could have an entire orchestra of his own!!
no subject
Date: 2009-11-15 07:55 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-11-15 09:59 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-11-15 09:58 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-11-16 12:39 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-11-16 12:43 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-11-16 12:52 am (UTC)"What about Indians from India, Jeeves?"
"I believe they're still referred to as Indians, sir."
"Right-ho. Now, are beazels still beazels?"
"I'm given to understand that that term is outmoded, sir. Also, I believe it is now considered incorrect or overly familiar to call a woman over the age of eighteen years a 'girl'."
"Golly. Are chaps still chaps?"
"I believe the current term for young men is now," and here Jeeves cringed, "guys, sir."
"So this advertisement about 'gay guys' is directed towards happy chaps, what?"
"I believe "gay" means homosexual now, sir."
"Homo-"
"Inverts, sir."
"Ah. Quite."
no subject
Date: 2009-11-16 12:58 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-11-16 12:54 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-11-16 01:00 am (UTC)I suspect Bertie would get addicted to TV very quickly. Jeeves would prefer documentaries if he watched at all and be utterly appalled at the state of the world. What passes for entertainment, Jeeves would find utterly scandalous.
no subject
Date: 2009-11-16 07:38 am (UTC)Jeeves has elegance, which I think doesn't count as much as charm does. Also, his job doesn't exist anymore nowadays.
no subject
Date: 2009-11-16 08:04 am (UTC)