illustrations
May. 23rd, 2005 08:27 am![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png)
![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png)
I'm an illustrations whore. I love the old line drawings, like in the Holmes books, and I'm madly in love with the fact that "Mike" has them, too. This, I think, is probably the best picture of Psmith - the angle of his head so you can see the narrow shape of his face, and you can just barely see the monocle in the other eye, and he's got the papers there under his elbow. :) edited to add: What age is he supposed to be? Given that Mike started school a year late, Psmith might actually be a year younger, so maybe 16 or 17... pushing 35. :)


no subject
Date: 2005-05-23 03:32 pm (UTC)Have stuck with J&W so far, but I really must read those Mike&Psmith books as well.
no subject
Date: 2005-05-23 07:28 pm (UTC)And just what I needed for my Psmith sock over on
desperatefansMan, I want a monocle.
no subject
Date: 2005-05-24 12:21 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-05-24 11:16 am (UTC)OMG WHERE?! Is there a Mike? Theirloveissotrue!
*madly secreting squee*
<333
no subject
Date: 2005-05-24 09:54 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-05-26 07:06 am (UTC)And don't worry, Psmith knows what he's thinking.
Or at least thinks he does. Which, in Psmith's world, is pretty much the same thing.
no subject
Date: 2005-05-26 10:41 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-05-26 02:09 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-05-26 07:05 am (UTC)*wibbles*
no subject
Date: 2005-05-26 01:24 pm (UTC)Then, later, in the book where he works for Lord Emsworth (? - I haven't read it, yet) he apparently seems to be named Ronald, and I think he's referenced as such on Wikipedia. (*looks it up*) Yup - Ronald Eustace Psmith, according to Wikipedia (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Psmith). I added the paragraph In his first appearance (in Mike or Mike and Psmith, depending which edition you have) he inexplicably implies to Mike that his first name is Rupert (Although Psmith, being the man that he is, could have done this on a mere whim). (And since I added that, someone else has related an amusing Psmithish incident as an example of selfishness, or perhaps Socialism - *chortles*).
My guess is because the Lord's secretary who he'd just replaced had been named Rupert and Wodehouse wanted to avoid confusion.
no subject
Date: 2005-05-26 08:49 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-05-27 10:35 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-05-29 10:34 pm (UTC)Oh, now I'm all confuzzled. *deliberates*
no subject
Date: 2005-05-24 11:18 am (UTC)But what is up with that thing on Mike's head? Ow.
(and then they had sex!1!)
no subject
Date: 2005-05-24 12:11 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-05-24 04:39 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-05-26 07:19 am (UTC)All the more reason for them to toss off everything and get down to itno subject
Date: 2005-05-26 10:40 am (UTC)Toss off. Heh heh.no subject
Date: 2005-05-24 11:31 am (UTC)... And that was my intelligent remark of the day. *tips hat and walks away*
no subject
Date: 2005-05-26 07:10 am (UTC)I, Tilly alias Jack of None, would totally hit that.
Of course, I'd much rather BE Psmith than DO Psmith, but I'm working on that.
no subject
Date: 2005-05-26 07:14 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-05-26 07:39 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-05-25 12:21 am (UTC)I second
Also...
no subject
Date: 2005-05-25 03:55 am (UTC):D That's Psmith's introduction post. For a place to start.
no subject
Date: 2005-05-26 07:15 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-05-26 07:16 am (UTC)