(no subject)
Apr. 19th, 2009 10:23 pm![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png)
![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png)
What ho all!
I just finished reading Ring for Jeeves, the Bertie-less novel Wodehouse wrote, and I'm wondering if the community would like a bit of information about it. I'm asking this because I suspect a lot of people in this community might not have looked over this book yet. I put off reading this one for the longest time, and only read it now because, as Jeeves might say, faute de mieux, or 'for want of anything better'. When you've read everything else, Ring for Jeeves seemed better than nothing.
I'll describe it very briefly.
This is the novel that is set post WW2, in which Jeeves is in the employ of Lord Rowcester. It's not really the joy to read that all the Bertie/Jeeves stories are, but it does have the odd laugh-out-loud moment.
Apart from the lack of Bertie, the big difference is that Jeeves is sort of the main character. At least, much closer to being the main character than he's ever been before. He's much more - I was going to say, 'developed', but that would imply that I don't think he's developed in the Bertie novels, and that wouldn't be true. I suppose the word is 'prominent'. His character is much more prominent. We're allowed to see what he's thinking once in a while, and Wodehouse devotes entire paragraphs to describing his mannerisms and actions as a means of demonstrating his aloof professionalism. And being more in the limelight, a lot of the novel's humour actually comes directly from Jeeves.
I suspect that, because the novel's not written in the first person, and because Wodehouse knew it was likely his last Jeeves novel, he allows himself to really show his personal love of the character. The description of Jeeves's first appearance is almost adulatory. In a way, I'd say he gets a bit carried away, and portrays Jeeves as being a bit more perfect than he really is, i.e. how he is in the Bertie stories. Jeeves is more selfless in his anxiety to serve, and he is also more colourful in expressing himself, less reserved. He is virtually the partner of his employer, barely subservient at all.
I'd recommend this novel for anyone wanting to see Jeeves in sharper focus than he can be seen through the Bertie stories. He might appear just a touch out of character, but I imagine those fic writers in the community would find it rather inspirational. Jeeves is a hard character to write!
Bertie Wooster is not present in the novel, but he is mentioned more than once - more than twice, in fact. These few mentions are somewhat slashy, I have to say, or at any rate, rather sweet. If anyone likes, I would be happy to transcribe the mentions of Bertie for the benefit of this community. Would that be welcome/appropriate? Let me know.
I just finished reading Ring for Jeeves, the Bertie-less novel Wodehouse wrote, and I'm wondering if the community would like a bit of information about it. I'm asking this because I suspect a lot of people in this community might not have looked over this book yet. I put off reading this one for the longest time, and only read it now because, as Jeeves might say, faute de mieux, or 'for want of anything better'. When you've read everything else, Ring for Jeeves seemed better than nothing.
I'll describe it very briefly.
This is the novel that is set post WW2, in which Jeeves is in the employ of Lord Rowcester. It's not really the joy to read that all the Bertie/Jeeves stories are, but it does have the odd laugh-out-loud moment.
Apart from the lack of Bertie, the big difference is that Jeeves is sort of the main character. At least, much closer to being the main character than he's ever been before. He's much more - I was going to say, 'developed', but that would imply that I don't think he's developed in the Bertie novels, and that wouldn't be true. I suppose the word is 'prominent'. His character is much more prominent. We're allowed to see what he's thinking once in a while, and Wodehouse devotes entire paragraphs to describing his mannerisms and actions as a means of demonstrating his aloof professionalism. And being more in the limelight, a lot of the novel's humour actually comes directly from Jeeves.
I suspect that, because the novel's not written in the first person, and because Wodehouse knew it was likely his last Jeeves novel, he allows himself to really show his personal love of the character. The description of Jeeves's first appearance is almost adulatory. In a way, I'd say he gets a bit carried away, and portrays Jeeves as being a bit more perfect than he really is, i.e. how he is in the Bertie stories. Jeeves is more selfless in his anxiety to serve, and he is also more colourful in expressing himself, less reserved. He is virtually the partner of his employer, barely subservient at all.
I'd recommend this novel for anyone wanting to see Jeeves in sharper focus than he can be seen through the Bertie stories. He might appear just a touch out of character, but I imagine those fic writers in the community would find it rather inspirational. Jeeves is a hard character to write!
Bertie Wooster is not present in the novel, but he is mentioned more than once - more than twice, in fact. These few mentions are somewhat slashy, I have to say, or at any rate, rather sweet. If anyone likes, I would be happy to transcribe the mentions of Bertie for the benefit of this community. Would that be welcome/appropriate? Let me know.
no subject
Date: 2009-04-20 05:07 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-04-20 05:20 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-04-20 05:33 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-04-20 05:27 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-04-20 05:29 am (UTC)You should definitely post the slashy quotes, though. Indeedsir can never get enough slashy quotes.
Jeeves POV
Date: 2009-04-20 08:13 am (UTC)On the main topic, I've just finished Ring for Jeeves as well, and enjoyed the focus on Jeeves, but missed Bertie! There's one sweet reference to him near the end that leads us to think that Jeeves is a bit... frustrated with Bertie. I won't go into further detail if it's going to be transcribed!
Re: Jeeves POV
Date: 2009-04-20 04:30 pm (UTC)Re: Jeeves POV
Date: 2009-04-20 08:20 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-04-20 05:35 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-04-20 06:30 am (UTC)So, yeah, bring all the good bits you like, I wanna see the cuteness and all.
no subject
Date: 2009-04-20 11:38 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-04-20 12:52 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-04-20 01:00 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-04-20 03:37 pm (UTC)Edit: And ditto to having to read that one now.
no subject
Date: 2009-04-20 04:27 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-04-20 05:06 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-04-20 11:17 pm (UTC)(I'll get to it later, if no-one else does it first!)
no subject
Date: 2009-04-20 07:28 pm (UTC)*watery eyes* You mean...he LEFT Bertie???!! :'(
no subject
Date: 2009-04-20 08:13 pm (UTC)I've not read this story either, for the same reasons many people probably avoid it - Jeeves without Bertie doesn't sound like fun. But it sounds like we may have pre-judged.
no subject
Date: 2009-04-20 11:13 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-04-20 10:52 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-04-21 05:05 pm (UTC)^_________________________^ Bonnie happy again.
no subject
Date: 2009-04-20 07:54 pm (UTC)Though despite Bertie not being around, the current master Lord Towchester in Return reminds me very much of him. Jeeves has got a certain type I suppose.
no subject
Date: 2009-04-20 09:43 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-04-20 09:53 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-04-20 10:14 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-04-20 10:54 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-04-20 11:10 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-04-21 12:15 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-04-20 11:08 pm (UTC)I imagine Ring for Jeeves is just as interesting as "Bertie Changes His Mind" as someone mentioned previously. I've spoken with other folks about this thing that sometimes happens in popular serials, where the author attempts to diverge from the expected narrative canon and the audience sometimes balks. Doyle did it too; one single short story is narrated from Holmes' POV, and I think one or two in 3rd person, but otherwise it's Watson all the way because it's what the audience feels most comfortable with.
Dang. I need to read this book. I don't suppose anyone has a copy that they'd be willing to lend/trade?
no subject
Date: 2009-04-21 02:58 am (UTC)If one were to merely *Google* "Ring for Jeeves torrent" and if one were to unintentionally scroll the mouse and click the "download" button and I rather fancy you'd have Wodehouse goodness in respectable timing.
OR, if one prefers, I could perhaps venture to send the desired material via the Internet.
One need only express an interest.
no subject
Date: 2009-04-21 03:00 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-04-21 03:03 am (UTC)And one MIGHT be able to provide a tiny spot of something or other in return? Ficcage perchance?
no subject
Date: 2009-04-22 02:20 am (UTC)Would an audiobook be satisfactory?
Such would not be necissary. Although, any ficcage would be appreciated as it always is, although I've got no clue what about.
no subject
Date: 2009-04-22 02:26 am (UTC)YES and audiobook would be wonderful! Please send if you can. And there will still be a fic in thanks, of course. Thanks!
no subject
Date: 2009-04-22 02:35 am (UTC)And, thank you in advance for the fics.
no subject
Date: 2009-04-23 03:28 am (UTC)Go on. Please.
no subject
Date: 2009-04-24 01:27 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-04-21 05:41 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-04-22 02:32 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-04-22 03:44 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-04-21 02:51 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-04-24 12:23 pm (UTC)"Shall I kiss you, Jeeves?"
"No, miss."
LOL.