Some Psmith trivia...
Mar. 10th, 2005 07:34 am![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png)
![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png)
Psmith was based on a real person, who Wodehouse didn't actually know, a flamboyant schoolmate of a friend who he heard stories about.
Psmith enters wearing lavender gloves on his first day working at the New Asiatic Bank in "Psmith in the City." Lavender gloves? This guy gets married, later? On the other hand, I guess getting married was just the thing one did, back then. No, no, I shouldn't jump to conclusions. Perhaps many straight men wore lavender gloves back in the day.
"Mike and Psmith" turned out to be the second half of the story I had already read under the title "Mike." I was kind of bummed, as I'd been looking forward to it being the second half of their year at Sedleigh, which I think would have been their last year at school. "Psmith in the City" begins with them discussing which "'Varsity" they're going to, but those plans are derailed by Mike's father running out of money and Psmith's father being capricious.
So far it's from Mike's point of view, and the poor thing is so depressed when he first goes to London to work at the bank all alone. He misses Psmith! Okay, it doesn't say so in so many words, but he misses everything about being a kid, tossed into being an adult much sooner than he'd expected he would be, and wishes he could be telling his troubles to Psmith in person instead of having to write, because Psmith has a way of making all life's little vicissitudes seem like amusements. And then Psmith shows up to work with him! Wearing lavender gloves! Joy!
no subject
Date: 2005-03-10 12:45 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-03-10 01:38 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-03-10 02:04 pm (UTC)~shrug~ Because Mike goes on with his life, and Psmith, Journalist and Leave it to Psmith don't even have any real active friendship left between them, just a kind of lukewarm remembrance of past affections?
Don't agree with you about Mike, either. He was delighted because all his dreadful problems were solved so beautiful, and grateful under his natural embarassment, but any kind of romantic interest seems to be decidedly onesided.
but then again I'm not the sort of person who needs a love to be exclusive and never ending in order to be quite real.
But Mike, I would suggest, is, and what kind of person Mike is is rather more relevant to the question of Mike/Psmith than the kind you are. ~grin~ He's a fundamentally decent, single-minded and rather intense young man under his inarticulateness, and heart once given, it would with honour remain with the object of his affections until death did them part. Anything else simply wouldn't be cricket, and definitely wouldn't be Mike.
Psmith is an entirely different variety of tea.
no subject
Date: 2005-03-10 03:25 pm (UTC)Yes, Mike is decent, single-minded and intense, but I don't think that precludes him from having a rather less intense involvement. Again, I may be completely wrong, given that I AM a prisoner of my own culture, but I've gotten the impression that sex between boys at boarding school was fairly commonplace and not considered 'real' - that people ignored it so long as they didn't continue those relationships later, to the exclusion of doing the proper thing; getting married (to a woman).
Like I said, I might be completely wrong, but for the purposes of writing slash I'm going to pretend I'm right, because otherwise I won't write any. ;)
no subject
Date: 2005-03-10 11:52 pm (UTC)Ok, this is based on way out-of-period knowledge, but it seems throughout history that homosexual affairs were often considered "temporary" by default, no matter how intense. Eventually you had to grow up and do the marriage thing -- sometimes you held on to your old attachments, sometimes not. I'm thinking of Greek/Roman culture here, and some things I've read from the Victorian era of people describing their extremely passionate friendships with people of the same gender in their youth (descriptions that could very easily suggest some kind of sexual connection, I think). It's entirely possible that Mike might view a relationship with Psmith in the same manner. Mike always struck me as rather a traditionalist at heart...I could see him simply giving up on his relationship with Psmith, no matter how intense, because it's the proper thing to do (Psmith I'm a little less able to account for in that case, but hey). Going by the "friendship" accounts, they might not even be viewing their relationship as a "romantic" one in the same way as a sexual relationship with a woman would be. That would account for the rather wistful tone with which they both seem to look back on their old friendship -- they had to grow out of all that. Maybe they wanted to, maybe they didn't.
Man, that's sort of depressing.
(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2005-03-11 09:24 am (UTC)Have you read Stephen Fry's autobiography "Moab Is My Washpot"? A *lot* of it is devoted to this. Much of his autobio is set during boarding school and deals with those kind of things. *wink wink nudge nudge*
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2005-03-10 03:38 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-03-10 03:09 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-03-10 03:15 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-03-10 03:30 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-03-10 03:43 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-03-11 02:28 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-03-11 02:38 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-03-11 05:32 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-03-11 09:26 am (UTC)But then again, to my perverted mind all is slash, so perhaps better to just forget what I said.
no subject
Date: 2005-03-11 03:35 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-03-11 11:51 am (UTC)I wonder if anyone has kindly done us up a page on homosexuals as portrayed in Victorian literature? *goes looking*
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2005-03-11 06:00 am (UTC)<3
no subject
Date: 2005-03-11 11:52 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-03-11 12:17 pm (UTC)The idea of a real live Jeeves amuses me. I want one! *covets*
no subject
Date: 2005-03-11 04:46 pm (UTC)Hope he found a Bertie to take care of.
(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2005-03-11 09:23 am (UTC)And YAY in agreement to all the slashy goodness that is Psmith/Mike. :D
no subject
Date: 2005-03-11 12:04 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-03-11 04:12 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-03-12 01:26 am (UTC)I agree. Or at least: I think Wodehouse intended that to be the real Psmith. His smooth-talking exists in perpetuity and therefore intelligent suavity = Psmith, IMO.
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From: