The third one - yeah, it's basically flirty eyesex, but I haven't decided whether or not they're a couple yet in that picture. I'll leave it up to the viewer's discretion. ;)
I'm glad you find it believable despite your preferences. Canon's vagueness with Jeeves & Bertie's physical descriptions can be a pain sometimes, but I do like that it also allows for a variety of interpretations.
My sketch collection of the ladies had Florence, Bobbie, Madeline, Stiffy, Corky, Angela, Emerald, Honoria, Rosie, Nobby, and Pauline. I was going to stick with the ladies of Bertie's own generation, but I'll consider doing young Dahlia and Agatha as well. In the meantime, have you seen wotwotleigh's drawing of young Dahlia here (http://indeedsir.livejournal.com/993426.html)?
![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png){kind=small}
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
no subject
Date: 2012-02-01 10:40 pm (UTC)Oh, he'll be seeing plenty of disapproval later.
The third one - yeah, it's basically flirty eyesex, but I haven't decided whether or not they're a couple yet in that picture. I'll leave it up to the viewer's discretion. ;)
I'm glad you find it believable despite your preferences. Canon's vagueness with Jeeves & Bertie's physical descriptions can be a pain sometimes, but I do like that it also allows for a variety of interpretations.
My sketch collection of the ladies had Florence, Bobbie, Madeline, Stiffy, Corky, Angela, Emerald, Honoria, Rosie, Nobby, and Pauline. I was going to stick with the ladies of Bertie's own generation, but I'll consider doing young Dahlia and Agatha as well. In the meantime, have you seen