I guess we just have different opinions on how discussions should take place. I think that arguing about anything fandom related can quickly get out of hand, and I thought that was the case. But again, I didn't read much, so I'm just guessing.
I don't understand your last paragraph. I had thought seme/uke, and d/s had the same idea to them. Were they discussing how s/u was illogical and sexist? Because then I believe that would be unnecessary to the discussion, since the topic was how s/u could be applied to J/W. 'Don't like what's being talked about, and can't come up with a reasonable comment to state your ideas, then you probably shouldn't enter the conversation.'
But that's my idea, and I know how that there is different ways a discussion can go, as well as how the entry should have been handled.
![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png){kind=small}
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
no subject
Date: 2009-06-10 01:07 am (UTC)I don't understand your last paragraph. I had thought seme/uke, and d/s had the same idea to them. Were they discussing how s/u was illogical and sexist? Because then I believe that would be unnecessary to the discussion, since the topic was how s/u could be applied to J/W. 'Don't like what's being talked about, and can't come up with a reasonable comment to state your ideas, then you probably shouldn't enter the conversation.'
But that's my idea, and I know how that there is different ways a discussion can go, as well as how the entry should have been handled.