ext_183839 ([identity profile] laeticiav.livejournal.com) wrote in [community profile] indeedsir_backup 2012-08-04 08:22 pm (UTC)

Sir is too kind :) Of course there is a risk that it might need more aquatic crack mpreg. So many things are lacking in that respect.

Hmm, so I assume it's not Jooster, short of cloning/reanimation/zombies (not that those are necessarily bad things). Please tell me there's not Spussie involved! (I think I just made that up -- it sounds obscene though).
Anyway, I'm happy to take a look. I've only been a Wodehouse convert for about a year, so I can't offer anything like the depth of critique on canon, linguistic appropriateness or period-correct details that others around here can, so it would definitely be worth also finding someone with a fish fed brain brim full of such things.
Do you want to pm it to me or is it easier to do via email?

Post a comment in response:

This account has disabled anonymous posting.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
No Subject Icon Selected
More info about formatting